Fragile and conflict affected situations vs East Asia & Pacific (IBRD-only countries)
GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)
Compare historical data and trends between these two countries
Fragile and conflict affected situations
5,636 intl$
Latest data: 2024
View Fragile and conflict affected situations profile →East Asia & Pacific (IBRD-only countries)
No data available
View East Asia & Pacific (IBRD-only countries) profile →Historical Comparison
Detailed Data
| Year | Fragile and conflict affected situations | East Asia & Pacific (IBRD-only countries) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5,636 intl$ | - | - |
| 2023 | 5,519 intl$ | - | - |
| 2022 | 5,326 intl$ | - | - |
| 2021 | 5,163 intl$ | - | - |
| 2020 | 4,904 intl$ | - | - |
| 2019 | 5,066 intl$ | - | - |
| 2018 | 4,842 intl$ | - | - |
| 2017 | 4,653 intl$ | - | - |
| 2016 | 4,413 intl$ | - | - |
| 2015 | 4,355 intl$ | - | - |
| 2014 | 4,547 intl$ | - | - |
| 2013 | 4,533 intl$ | - | - |
| 2012 | 4,341 intl$ | - | - |
| 2011 | 4,136 intl$ | - | - |
| 2010 | 4,112 intl$ | - | - |
| 2009 | 3,946 intl$ | - | - |
| 2008 | 3,992 intl$ | - | - |
| 2007 | 3,817 intl$ | - | - |
| 2006 | 3,570 intl$ | - | - |
| 2005 | 3,322 intl$ | - | - |
| 2004 | 3,100 intl$ | - | - |
| 2003 | 2,718 intl$ | - | - |
| 2002 | 2,771 intl$ | - | - |
| 2001 | 2,744 intl$ | - | - |
| 2000 | 2,631 intl$ | - | - |
| 1999 | 2,481 intl$ | - | - |
| 1998 | 2,454 intl$ | - | - |
| 1997 | 2,375 intl$ | - | - |
| 1996 | 2,268 intl$ | - | - |
| 1995 | 2,241 intl$ | - | - |
| 1994 | 2,267 intl$ | - | - |
| 1993 | 2,412 intl$ | - | - |
| 1992 | 2,484 intl$ | - | - |
| 1991 | 2,488 intl$ | - | - |
| 1990 | 2,450 intl$ | - | - |
Compare Other Indicators
Explore how these countries compare across different economic indicators
Compare GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) data between Fragile and conflict affected situations and East Asia & Pacific (IBRD-only countries). Data is sourced from reliable international organizations and updated regularly.
Data sources: World Bank, IMF, OECD, Transparency International